Knowledge of Research and Publication Ethics in a Nigerian Medical College


  • SO Ogundele Lagos State University College of Medicine Ikeja
  • YA Kuyinu
  • MA Salisu
  • O Odusanya



Academics, Ethics, Misconducts, Publications, Research


Background: In academia, the aphorism 'publish or perish' is commonly used. The pressure to publish academic papers can sometimes lead researchers to engage in unethical practices in the conduct, reporting or publishing of their research works.

Objective: To assess the awareness and practices of ethical issues in the conduct, reporting, and publishing of research among academics.

Methods: The study was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of the academic staff of a Nigerian medical college. A structured questionnaire was used to collect relevant information about publishing experience and observation of practices considered to be acts of research misconduct.  

Results: A total of 94 out of 108 academics responded to the questionnaires giving a response rate of 87%. The commonest act of research misconduct reported by the respondents was plagiarism with an incidence rate of 25%. The incidence rates for awareness of data fabrication and falsification were 22% and 21% respectively. The proportions of respondents who were aware of gift and ghost authorship were 63% and 20% respectively. Only 41% of the respondents could recall all the criteria for authorship of an academic paper while 20% could not recollect any of the criteria.

Conclusion: Research misconduct and unethical publication practices are common observations among the respondents in this survey. It is recommended that researchers should familiarize themselves with the various ethical guidelines and requirements for authorship and agree on the sequence of the names of authors in the by-line of the proposed publication at the start of project work.


Albert T, Wager E. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers. The COPE Report 2003. Available online at, Accessed 30th September 2018.

Rawat S, Meena S. Publish or perish: Where are we heading? J Res Med Sci 2014; 19(20): 87-89.

Coolidge HJ. (Editor). Archibald Cary Coolidge: Life and Letters; p.308. Available at Accessed 30 September 2018.

Babalola O, Grant-Kels JM, Parish LC. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication. Clin Dermatol 2012; 30(2): 231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.013.

Chu KM, Jayaraman S, Kyamanywa P, Ntakiyiruta G. Building Research Capacity in Africa: Equity and Global Health Collaborations. PLoS Med 2014; 11(3): e1001612.

Hofmann B, Myhr AI, Holm S. Scientific dishonesty—a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway. BMC Medical Ethics 2013; 14: 3. Available at,

ICMJE. Defining the role of authors and contributors. Available at, Accessed on 18th September 2018.

Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000; 283:2701–11

Varmus H, Satcher D. Ethical Complexities of Conducting Research in Developing Countries. N Engl J Med 1997; 337 (14): 1003-1005.

Adeleye OA, Adebamowo CA. Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2012; 7(5): 15–24.

Okonta PI, Rossouw T. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country. BMC Medical Ethics 2014; 15: 25.

Okonta P, Rossouw T. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Dev World Bioeth, 2012; 13(3). doi:10.1111/j.1471- 8847.2012.00339.x.

Abbrecht P, Davidian N, Merrill S, Price AR. The role of the office of research integrity in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Res 2007; 132: 231–239.

Dahlberg JE, Davidian NM. Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16(4): 737-741.

Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A. Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher’s Perspective. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61 (Suppl 152): 1–26.

Lenz H. Scientific ethics and publishing conduct. J Bus Econ 2014; 84: 1167–1189. DOI 10.1007/s11573-014-0722-8.

Tscharrntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multi-authored Publications. PloS Biol 2007; 5(1); e18. doi: 10.1371/jounal.pbio.0050018

Ogundele SO, Ajose FO, Kuyinu YA, Odusanya OO. Ethics and Governance of Clinical Research in a Developing Country: A cross-sectional survey among resident physicians in Nigeria. Pharm Med 2014; 28(5): 249-254. doi: 10.1007/s40290-014-0068-0

Rankert EA, Amdur RJ. Institutional Review Board: Management and function. 2nd Edition. 2005.

National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC). National Code of Health Research Ethics, 2007. Accessed 30th August 2018.

World Health Organisation. Standards and operational guidance for ethics review of health-related research with human participants, 2011. Accessed 20th July 2018.

Agunloye AM, Salami AT, Lawan A. Current role of research ethics committees in health research in three geopolitical zones in Nigeria: a qualitative study. South Afr J Bioethics Law 2014; 7(1): 19–22. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.309. 21.

Schulzl KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials. PLoS Medicine 2010; 7(3): e1000251.

Vandenboucke JP, Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, for the STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. PloS Med 20007; 4(10): e297

International Conference of Harmonization. ICH tripartite guideline for good clinical practices E6 (R1), 10th June 1996.Available at Accessed 31st August 2017

Additional Files





Original Research