Correlation between Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsy Gleason Score

  • PE Ngwu
  • GO Achor
  • VU Eziefule
  • JI Orji
  • FT Alozie
Keywords: Digital Rectal Examination, Gleason score, Histologic Analysis, Prostate cancer, Prostate Specific Antigen

Abstract

Background: Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) is a commonly used marker in prostate cancer management. Gleason grading is one of the most powerful predictors of prostatic biological behaviour. PSA, when combined with the Gleason score and clinical stage, improves the prediction of the pathological stage for prostate cancer.
Objectives: To assess the degree of correlation between PSA level and Gleason score as well as determine the likelihood of aggressiveness of prostate cancer using Gleason score as a parameter.
Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted among 234 consecutive consenting patients presenting to the Urology Out-Patient Clinic between April 2015 and March 2018. Serum PSA was done and patients with values above 4ng/ml and/or abnormal Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) were selected to have a prostate biopsy. The sample was histologically analysed with Gleason score recorded for those with prostate cancer. Gleason score was then correlated with PSA levels.
Results: The mean age for prostate cancer patients was 71.3±8.7 years. The mean PSA for patients with prostate cancer was 52.3±37.5ng/ml (Confidence Interval = 46.1-58.6) with p<0.001. About 18.2% of histologically confirmed prostate cancer cases had Gleason score 8-10 implying a high level of tumour aggressiveness. There is a positive correlation between PSA and Gleason score with R-value 0.590 indicating a good degree of correlation.
Conclusion: There is a good degree of a positive correlation between PSA level and Gleason score, as well as a high level of aggressiveness of prostate cancer in Umuahia.

References

Pernar C, Ebot E, Wilson K, Mucci L. The epidemiology of prostate cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2018; 8(12): a030361.

Ikwuerowo S, Omisanjo O, Bioku M, Ajala M, Mordi V, Esho J. Prevalence and characteristics of prostate cancer among participants of a community-based screening in Nigeria using serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Pan Afr Med J 2013; 15: 129.

Obiora C, Nwosu S. A histopathological study of carcinoma of the prostate in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Prac 2011; 14(3): 363-367.

Han M, Gann PH, Catalona WJ. Prostate-specific antigen and screening for prostate cancer. Med Clin N Am 2004; 88: 245–265.

Emokpae MA, Das SC, Orok T, Mohammed AZ, Al Hassan S. Early detection of prostate cancer: Evaluating the diagnostic performance of prostate specific antigen by comparing with histological technique among Africans. Indian J Clin Chem 2004; 19(1): 62-66.

Chen N, Zhou Q. The evolving Gleason grading system. Chinese J Res 2016; 28(1) 58-64.

Akang EE, Aligbe JU, Olisa EG. Prostatic tumours in Benin City, Nigeria. West Afr J Med 1996; 15(1):56-60.

Zivkovic S. Correlation between prostate specific antigen and histopathological difference of prostate carcinoma. Arch Oncol 2004; 12(3): 148-151.

Sweat SD, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak J, Blute ML, Eincke H. Competing risk analysis after radical prostatectomy for clinically non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma according to clinical Gleason score and patient age. J Urol 2002; 168; 525-529.

Graham J, Baker M, Macbeth F, Titshall V. Diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 2008; 336(7644): 610-612.

Gurumurthy D, Maggad R, Patel S. Prostate carcinoma: correlation of histopathology with serum prostate specific antigen. Sci J Clin Med 2015; 4(4): 1-5.

Schroder FH, Van-Der Crvijsen-Koeter I, De Koning HJ, Vis AN, Hoedemaeker RF, et al. Prostate cancer detection at low prostate-specific antigen. J Urol 2000; 163(3): 806-812.

Dawam D, Rafindadi AH, Kakayi GD. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma in native Africans. Br J Urol 2000; 85: 1074.

Ekwere PD, Egbe SN. The changing pattern of prostate cancer in Nigerians: current status in the southeastern states. J Natl Med Assoc 2002; 94(7): 619-627.

Published
2019-12-09
Section
Original Research