The attitude of Nigerian women to termination of pregnancies with major congenital anomalies

  • EJ Enabudoso
  • JA Akinmoladun
Keywords: Abortion, Foetus, Major Congenital Anomalies, Nigeria, Termination of pregnancy, Ultrasound

Abstract

Background: When couples are confronted with a pregnancy in which there is a major foetal anomaly, they have only two options: termination of the pregnancy or allowing the baby to be born.

Objective: To determine the attitude of pregnant women in Nigeria to termination of pregnancies with major congenital anomalies.

Methods: This is a descriptive study undertaken at two centres in Nigeria. Structured and pretested self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection including socio-demographics and attitude to termination of pregnancies with major congenital anomalies. 

Results: Three hundred and fifty-six pregnant women participated in the study. Most of the respondents were in the 21-40 years age group. More than half of the participants (236; 66.3%) agreed with the termination of pregnancies with major congenital anomalies and some of their reasons were "to prevent the baby from suffering" and "to prevent waste of resources”. For the 120 (33.7%) who did not agree with termination of such pregnancies, some of their reasons were “to trust God for a miracle” and “hoping that God will not allow such”

Conclusion: The findings from this study show that majority of the women were favourably disposed to the termination of pregnancies with major anomalies. However, women with such pregnancies need to be adequately counselled to be aware of the consequences of the decisions they make. Also, in a country where there are legal restrictions of abortion, efforts should be made to consider termination of pregnancies with major anomalies in the abortion laws.

References

Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med 2006; 3: e442.

ICBDMS. Congenital Malformations Worldwide. A Report from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems, Rome, Italy, 2010. Accessed 16 October 2019.

World Health Statistics. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2008. EB 125/7.

Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell B. March of Dimes: Global Report on Birth Defects – The Hidden Toll of Dying and Disabled Children March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. White Plains, NY. 2006.

Mazer P, Gischler S, Koot H, Tibboel D, Dijk M, Duivenvoorden H. Impact of a child with congenital anomalies on parents (ICCAP) questionnaire; a psychometric analysis. Health Quality Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 102-112.

Levi S. Ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: polemics around routine ultrasound screening for second-trimester fetal malformations. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 285–295.

Rauch ER, Smulian JC, DePrince K, Ananth CV, Marcella SW. Pregnancy interruption after second-trimester diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: The New Jersey Fetal Abnormalities Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193:1492–1497.

Gesser-Edelsburg A, Shahbari NA. Decision-making on terminating a pregnancy for Muslim Arab women pregnant with fetuses with congenital anomalies: maternal affect and doctor-patient communication. Reproductive Health. 2017; 14: 49.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Wales and Scotland. Working Party Report. London: RCOG; 1996.

Finer L, Fine JB. Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: 585-589.

Choice of Termination of Pregnancy Amendment Act, 2004. South African Government Gazette 2005; 476: 27267.

World Abortion Policies.2007. Accessed at http://www.un.org/esa/population/publication/ 2007 abortion_policies_chart. Accessed 20 April 2019.

Akinmoladun JA, Ogbole GI, Oluwasola TAO. Pattern and outcome of prenatally diagnosed major congenital anomalies at a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. Niger J Clin Pract Practice 2018; 21: 560-565.

Ferreira da Costa LL, Hardy E, Duarte Osis MR, Faundes A. Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality Incompatible with Life: Women’s Experiences in Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters 2005; 13: 139–146.

Souka AP, Michalitsi VD, Skentou H, et al. Attitudes of pregnant women regarding termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 977-980.

Breeze ACG, Lees CC, Kumar A, Missfelder-Lobos HH, Murdoch EM. Palliative care for prenatally diagnosed lethal fetal abnormality. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92: F56-F58.

Gammeltoft T, Hang TM, Hiep NT, Hanh NTT. Late-term abortion for fetal anomaly: Vietnamese women’s experience. Reprod Health Matters 2008; 16: 46-56.

Ndjapa-Ndamkou C, Govender L, Moodley J. Views and attitudes of pregnant women regarding late termination of pregnancy for severe fetal abnormalities at a tertiary hospital in KwaZulu-Natal. South Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 19: 49-52.

Al-Sulaiman A, Hewison J. Abu-Amero KK, Ahmed S, Green JM, Hirst J. Attitudes to prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for 30 conditions among women in Saudi Arabia and the UK. Prenatal Diagnosis 2012; 32: 1109–1113.

Govender L, Ndjapa-Ndamkou C, Aldous C, Moodley J. A pilot study of women's experiences after being offered late termination of pregnancy for severe fetal anomaly. Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18 (Suppl 1): S71-S76.

Salvesen KA, Oyen L, Schmidt N, Malt UF, Eik-Nes SH. Comparison of long-term psychological responses of women after pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies and after perinatal loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 80-85.

Crombleholme TM, D’Alton M, Cendron M, Alman B, Goldberg MD, Klauber GT, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and the pediatric surgeon: the impact of prenatal consultation on perinatal management. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31:156–162.

Luks FI, Carr SR, Feit LR, Rubin LP. Experience with a multidisciplinary antenatal diagnosis and management model in fetal medicine. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 14: 333–337.

Published
2020-08-22
Section
Original Research