Perception of Preclinical Medical Students About Pathology Subject and the Teaching Methods in an Indian Medical College

  • S Sood
  • SP Gulia
Keywords: Medical curriculum, Medical Students, Pathology, Perception, Preclinical Training, Teaching Methods

Abstract

Background: Pathology is a key subject at the pre-clinical stage of medical training.

Objectives: To determine the perception of second-year MBBS (preclinical) students regarding Pathology as a subject and the effectiveness of various teaching, learning and assessment methods.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 145 randomly selected, second-year MBBS students, appearing for their Phase II final university exams. A predesigned questionnaire with questions about students’ perception of pathology was administered to the students. The questionnaire also assessed the various teaching-learning methods currently used by the faculty. The students were also requested to make suggestions regarding the modifications needed in the teaching methods.

Results: A total of 145 out of 150 regular-batch students participated in the study. One hundred (68.9%) regarded pathology as an interesting subject; 131 (90.3%) felt pathology acts as a bridge between paraclinical and clinical branches while 107 (73.8%) found blackboard teaching more effective.

Conclusion: The study revealed that the preclinical medical students showed a favourable predisposition towards pathology as a subject while highlighting areas that need to be addressed for more effective teaching and improved learning towards producing better medical professionals.

References

Domizio P. The Changing role of pathology in the undergraduate curriculum. In: Hall PA, Wright NA (Editors). Understanding Disease: A centenary celebration of the Pathological Society, London: Wiley. 2006: p. 137-152.

Rafique N. Introducing integrated practical examination for second-year MBBS class. Proceedings in the 7th GCC Medical Colleges Conference by the Saudi Society of Family and Community Medicine 2009 Nov 17th-19th. Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Quadri SSS, Srujana S, Mahesh S, Bheeshma B. Undergraduate medical students’ feedback and perceptions on teaching-learning methodology in Pathology at Government Medical College. Int Arch Integrated Med 2016; 3: 28-35.

Emerald NM, Han TZ, Oo SS. Students' perception on the effectiveness of pathology teaching in Phase 1 medical program at UCST university. Int J Med Sci Educ 2016; 3: 264-273.

Rahman N, Ferdousi S, Hoq N, Amin R, Kabir J. Evaluation of objective structured practical examination and traditional practical examination. Mymensingh Med J 2007; 16: 7-11. https://doi.org/10.3329/mmj.v16i1.239

Clinical Pharmacology Section of Indian Pharmacological Society supported by WHO SEAR. MBBS curriculum review draft developed by core group for MBBS curriculum development (IPS members) at the National Consultative Meeting on review of pharmacology curriculum for UG and PG medical education in India with focus on better medicines for children. Kolkata. 2010 September 29-30th. Available from: URL: http://aimdda.wordpress.com/author/aimdda/

Gulikers J, Bastiaens T, Kirschner P, Kester L. Relations between student perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approaches and learning outcome. Studies Educ Evaluation 2006; 32: 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.10.003

Shah A, Shethwala N, Parmar B. Perception of undergraduate medical students towards the subject of Pathology at one of the Medical Colleges of Gujarat, India. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014; 3: 863-865. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2014.140420142

Goyal M, Bansal M, Gupta A, Yadav D. Perceptions and suggestions of second professional MBBS students about their teaching and learning process: An analytical study. Nat J Integrated Res Med 2010; 1: 20-24.

Kate MS, Kulkarni UJ, Supe A, Deshmukh YA. Introducing integrated teaching in undergraduate medical curriculum. Int J Pharma Sci Res 2010; 1(1): 18-22.

Vijayan P, Ponniah A. A survey study based on undergraduate medical students' feedback regarding pathology and the teaching-learning methodologies employed. Trop J Path Micro 2017; 3: 149-154. https://doi.org/10.17511/jopm.2017.i2.14

Sharma P, Singh P, Kalhan S, Garg S. Analysis of factors affecting academic performance of MBBS Students in pathology. Ann Int Med Den Res 2017; 3: PT09-PT15. https://doi.org/10.21276/aimdr.2017.3.5.PT4

Woltering V, Herrler A, Spitzer K, Spreckelsen C. Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009; 14: 725-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6

Gray K, Tobin J. Introducing an online community into a clinical education setting: a pilot study of student and staff engagement and outcomes using blended learning. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-6

Daiz-Perez JA, Raju S, Julio ADP, Sharat R, Echeverri JH. Evaluation of a teaching strategy based on the integration of clinical subjects, virtual autopsy, pathology museum, and digital microscopy for medical students. J Pathol Inform 2014; 5: 25. https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.137729

Regulations on Graduate Medical Education (Amendment), 2019. No. MCI-34(41)/2019-Med./161726. November 4, 2019; Part III-Sec. 4:59.

Published
2021-05-28
Section
Original Research